File #: ID-205-17    Version: 1 Name: Ward Map Boundary Update 2017
Type: Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/3/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 6/6/2017 Final action:
Title: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRIGHTON, COLORADO, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2100 AND REPEALING AND REENACTING CITY OF BRIGHTON MUNICIPAL CODE, ARTICLE 1.16 REGARDING ELECTION WARDS AND PRECINCTS; CLARIFYING THE APPLICATION OF SAID BOUNDARY REVISIONS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS RELATED THERETO
Attachments: 1. City Council Draft Ordinance Ward Map Update, 2. Ward Map_2017
Related files: ID-173-17, ID-09-17
Body
Department of Community Development
Reference: Ward Boundary Map Update

To: Mayor Richard N. McLean and Members of City Council
Through: Clint Blackhurst, Interim City Manager
Prepared By: Joshua Ryan, GIS Technician
Through: Marv Falconburg, Assistant City Manager Operations; Holly Prather Community Developer Director
Date Prepared: April 21, 2017
PURPOSE
To amend the ward boundaries to reflect an increase in the population of the City of Brighton between July 2011 (previous ward boundaries update) and June 2017.The last Ward Boundary update based on population was completed in July 2011.

BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The current estimated population for the city of Brighton is 36,944. Note: This number reflects the data provided by the US Census Bureau and city data on certificates of occupancies issued since the Census date. This resulted in the following population distributions for each of the four wards:

Ward 1: 10,459
Ward 2: 7,935
Ward 3: 9,371
Ward 4: 9,179

The Brighton City Charter requires that the division of the City into wards be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Colorado Constitution. Section 46 of Article V of the Constitution of Colorado requires that each ward have "...a population as nearly equal as may be, as required by the Constitution of the United States, but in no event shall there be more than five percent deviation between the most populous and the least populous district in each house."

Case law has interpreted this provision to mean that: "(T)he sum of the percent by which the largest district's population exceeds that of the ideal district and the percent by which the smallest district population falls short of the population of the ideal district must be less than 5%."

Currently, the sum of the percent by which the population of the largest ward (Ward 1 at 10,459) exceeds the ideal ward (9,236) and the percent by which the smallest ward (Ward 2 at 7,935) falls short of the population of the ideal war...

Click here for full text