File #: ID-360-17    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/4/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/21/2017 Final action:
Title: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRIGHTON, COLORADO REPEALING ARTICLE 5-28 CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM OF THE BRIGHTON MUNICIPAL CODE; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS RELATED THERETO (FINAL READING)
Attachments: 1. Ord Repealing Art 5 28 Cable Television
Body
Department of Information Technology
Reference: Comcast Franchise Agreement

To: Mayor Richard N. McLean and Members of City Council
Through: Philip Rodriguez, City Manager
Prepared By: Jeromy King
Date Prepared: September 20, 2017
PURPOSE
Renewal of the Comcast Franchise Agreement and the Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance (CCUA) Customer Service Standards.
BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2016 by Resolution 2016-138, the City extended its 2001 cable franchise agreement with Comcast in order to allow for sufficient time to complete a negotiation process for a new franchise. The City Attorney's Office, Staff, outside counsel, and Comcast have completed a recommended renewal Franchise Agreement with Comcast for City Council's consideration.
Approval or denial of a cable franchise renewal requires an ordinance of the City and an associated public hearing. It is important to note that federal law presumes that an incumbent cable operator has a right to a renewal of its franchise if it proposes and has the legal, financial, and technical capability to comply with a franchise that meets the future cable-related needs of the community, taking into account the cost of meeting those needs.
Review criteria by which a renewal of a cable franchise may be denied are set forth in federal law and include:
1. The Cable Operator does not have the financial, technical or legal qualifications to comply with the terms of a franchise that meets the future cable-related needs of the community, taking into account the costs of meeting those needs;
2. The Cable Operator will not provide adequate public, educational and governmental access channel capacity, facilities or financial support;
3. The Cable Operator's proposed terms do not comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, including but not limited to local customer service standards or relevant existing contractual obligations of the City; or
4. The Cable Operator has a record of violations ...

Click here for full text